This is a complete sample report, generated by the same pipeline that will analyze your photos, for a synthetic reference subject — a 30-year-old male of European ancestry with typical lifestyle answers. Your report is built from your own measurements. Start your own plan.

Kanon Measured facial analysis

Your measured baseline.

7/8/2026/25-34/male norms/European contextSample — synthetic reference subject

Facial proportionsTypical range
Eyes & periorbitalTypical range
NoseTypical range
Jaw, chin & lower faceTypical range
Lips & mouthTypical range
SymmetryTypical range
SkinTypical range
Feature characterTypical range

Of the 44 dimensions measured, 44 currently carry a verified reference norm — and every one sits within the typical range for your demographic reference. The remaining dimensions are shown as measurements pending verified norms. Kanon reads your face as a set of positions, never a single rating.

02 Your face, mapped

Every number is drawn from these points.

Switch overlays to see the exact geometry each metric is computed from, on your own photo — and toggle all 478 landmarks to confirm the tracking is real. Nothing here is decorative.

This sample is generated for a reference subject, so there is no personal photo to annotate. Run your own analysis with your six photos to see the measured lines drawn on your face.

03 Measured strengths

What's working for you.

Under-eye darkness index
0.30index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your under-eye tone shows the mild, normal contrast most faces have against the cheek — nothing that reads as tired at conversational distance.

Under-eye hollow (shading gradient)
0.25index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your lower-lid-to-cheek transition shows the mild shading gradient typical of adult faces; it does not read as hollow at normal viewing distance.

Brow tilt
0.00deg
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your brow axis runs close to level with a natural rise — the orientation most faces carry — which frames the eyes calmly.

Skin redness index
0.30index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your measured cheek redness sits in the typical range — the normal warmth most complexions show under neutral light.

Periorbital luminance delta
-0.08index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The brightness around your eyes sits in the normal relationship to your cheeks — the mild periorbital shading nearly all adult faces show.

Apparent vs stated age gap
0.00years
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The model’s estimate of your photographed age tracks your stated age closely — your skin and features are reading true to your years.

Canthal tilt
3.58deg
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your outer eye corners sit modestly higher than the inner corners — the gentle upward tilt most faces carry — which gives the eye area an alert, rested look.

Submental-cervical angle
56.21deg
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The line from your chin back under the jaw sits in the typical range, keeping a clear separation between jawline and neck in profile.

04 Measured opportunities

Where the headroom is.

Opportunities are flagged where a measurement sits beyond your demographic norm. With norms pending, none is claimed. Your protocol below still includes the evidence-based skin and lifestyle steps your questionnaire supports — those don't depend on a facial-geometry norm.

05 Findings by feature

The full measurement set.

Every metric, its measured value, and — on demand — the exact lines on your face. Expand any finding to see what it measures.

Facial proportions

Facial thirds balance
0.00cv
−0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your forehead, midface, and lower face divide the face into three well-balanced vertical sections, which reads as harmonious in both photos and person.

Facial fifths (eye width vs face width)
0.20ratio
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your eye width sits close to one-fifth of your face width — the classical horizontal proportion — which is why the eye region reads as well-placed within the face.

Midface ratio
1.26ipd
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The distance from your eye line to your mouth sits in the typical range relative to your eye spacing, giving the midface a balanced vertical presence.

Facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR)
1.99ratio
+0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your facial width-to-height ratio sits in the typical range: the face is neither notably wide nor notably long through the midface.

Lower-third balance (philtrum area : chin area)
0.49ratio
−0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your lower face divides close to the classical one-third above the lip line, two-thirds below — a balanced lower-third that supports both smile and jawline.

Face height-to-width ratio
1.50ratio
+0.6 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your overall face height-to-width proportion sits in the typical oval range, which pairs well with most hairstyle and eyewear geometries.

Jaw width vs cheekbone width
0.75ratio
−0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your jaw width sits in a balanced relationship to your cheekbone width, producing a smooth taper from midface to jawline.

Forehead height ratio
0.33ratio
+0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your forehead occupies close to the classical one-third of face height, keeping the vertical thirds in comfortable balance.

Eyes & periorbital

Canthal tilt
3.58deg
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your outer eye corners sit modestly higher than the inner corners — the gentle upward tilt most faces carry — which gives the eye area an alert, rested look.

Eye aspect ratio (openness)
0.32ratio
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your eye height-to-width proportion sits in the typical range, balancing openness with an almond contour.

Eye spacing vs face width
0.42ratio
+0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your eye spacing relative to face width sits in the typical range, which keeps the upper face evenly weighted and makes most eyewear geometries work without adjustment.

Upper eyelid exposure
0.01ipd
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The visible band of upper eyelid above your lash line sits in the typical range, giving the eye area a rested, defined look.

Under-eye darkness index
0.30index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your under-eye tone shows the mild, normal contrast most faces have against the cheek — nothing that reads as tired at conversational distance.

Under-eye hollow (shading gradient)
0.25index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your lower-lid-to-cheek transition shows the mild shading gradient typical of adult faces; it does not read as hollow at normal viewing distance.

Brow position
0.30ipd
−0.6 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your brows sit at a typical height above the eye line, framing the eyes without crowding or distancing them.

Brow tilt
0.00deg
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your brow axis runs close to level with a natural rise — the orientation most faces carry — which frames the eyes calmly.

Nose

Nasofrontal angle
128.22deg
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The angle where your forehead meets your nasal bridge sits in the typical range, producing a smooth, well-defined upper profile line.

Nasolabial angle
147.53deg
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The angle where your nose base meets your upper lip sits in the typical range, giving the nose-to-lip transition a balanced, relaxed profile line.

Nasal width vs eye spacing
0.78ratio
−0.8 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your nasal base width sits in proportion with your eye spacing, anchoring the midface the way the classical canon describes.

Dorsal profile deviation
-0.08ratio
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your nasal bridge tracks close to a straight line from the top of the nose to the tip in profile — an even dorsal line.

Nasal tip rotation
50.19deg
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your nasal tip rotation sits in the typical range, giving the profile a balanced tip position that photographs well from level angles.

Jaw, chin & lower face

Gonial angle
140.62deg
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The corner of your jaw sits in the typical angular range, giving the profile a clear but soft-edged transition from ear to chin.

Ramus-to-mandible proportion
1.03ratio
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The vertical and horizontal portions of your jaw sit in typical proportion, giving the profile a balanced ear-to-chin frame.

Chin projection
0.03ratio
−0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your chin sits close to the facial reference line in profile — a balanced projection that supports both the jawline and the lip line.

Submental-cervical angle
56.21deg
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The line from your chin back under the jaw sits in the typical range, keeping a clear separation between jawline and neck in profile.

Jaw definition index
0.55index
+0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your jawline shows typical edge definition in the capture lighting: clearly visible without being severe.

Chin height
0.62ipd
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your chin height sits in the typical range for the lower face, supporting a balanced transition from lip to jaw point.

Lip-chin-throat line
-0.13ratio
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your lower lip sits just behind the nose-to-chin aesthetic line — the classic harmonious relationship between lips, chin, and throat in profile.

Lips & mouth

Upper-to-lower lip ratio
0.67ratio
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your upper and lower lip volumes sit near the classical relationship — a fuller lower lip balanced by a defined upper lip.

Lip fullness
0.29ipd
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your overall lip volume sits in the typical range for your facial scale, keeping the mouth in easy balance with the surrounding features.

Philtrum length
0.26ipd
−0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The distance between your nose and upper lip sits in the typical range, keeping the nose-lip-chin column evenly spaced.

Smile arc
0.04ipd
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your smile arc is consonant: the corners lift comfortably above the central lip line when you smile, which is the configuration that reads warmest in photos.

Symmetry

Global facial symmetry
0.00ipd
−0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your face shows the small left-right differences virtually all faces have; none of them is large enough to register at conversational distance.

Eye level asymmetry
0.00ipd
−0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your eyes sit within the normal band of levelness; the tiny vertical difference most faces carry is present but visually silent.

Nasal deviation
0.00ipd
−0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your nasal tip sits within the normal distance of the facial midline; the nose reads as straight at ordinary viewing distances.

Skin

Skin texture roughness
0.30index
−0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your skin texture variance sits in the typical range: normal pores and surface character without patterns that read as rough on camera.

Skin redness index
0.30index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your measured cheek redness sits in the typical range — the normal warmth most complexions show under neutral light.

Pigmentation evenness
0.75index
+0.7 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your skin tone is typically even across the measured patches — small local variations, but nothing that reads as patchiness at conversational distance.

Periorbital luminance delta
-0.08index
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The brightness around your eyes sits in the normal relationship to your cheeks — the mild periorbital shading nearly all adult faces show.

Apparent vs stated age gap
0.00years
+0.0 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

The model’s estimate of your photographed age tracks your stated age closely — your skin and features are reading true to your years.

Fine-line density
0.20index
+0.5 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your measured fine-line density is typical for an adult face — early expression lines in the usual places, reading as animation rather than age.

Feature character

Facial dimorphism composite
-0.00z
−0.2 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your measured features balance angular and soft elements in roughly equal measure — a versatile middle position on the masculine–feminine continuum that adapts well to different styling directions.

Cheekbone prominence
0.88ratio
+0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your cheekbone width sits in typical proportion to your facial outline, giving the midface visible but understated structure.

Hairline shape class
1.00class
−0.1 SDNORM POSITION−3 SDNORM MEAN+3 SD

Your hairline follows a rounded arc across the forehead — the most common frame shape, and one that pairs easily with nearly any hairstyle.

06 Ancestry context

Your features, in the right context.

Every comparison in this report uses reference norms for your self-identified ancestry (European) wherever published data exists — a single beauty standard applied to every face produces biased, useless guidance. Where a measurement reads as "different" against a generic norm but is characteristic of your ancestry group, we treat it as part of your face's coherent architecture, not a deviation to correct. Where reference data for your group is thin, the finding is explicitly marked as lower-confidence and the language is softened to match.

07 Projected outcome

The plan, on your own face.

A conservative, identity-locked projection of your non-surgical protocol — skin clarity, tone, under-eye and grooming only. Bone structure and features are never altered; any projection that drifts from your identity is rejected and replaced with the honest metric deltas instead.

This sample is generated for a reference subject, so there is no personal photo to project. Run your own analysis to generate your identity-locked before/after.

08 Your protocol

Sequenced for compounding.

Foundations first, then actives and habits, then consolidation. Every item exists because a rule fired — the rule ID is printed for auditability. Items marked "discuss with a licensed provider" are educational flags, not prescriptions.

Phase 1Foundation

Days 0–30
Daily broad-spectrum sunscreen (applied as directed on the product label)
Grade A · Grade A — strong published evidence
What
Broad-spectrum filters absorb or reflect ultraviolet radiation before it triggers the photodamage cascade that drives pigment unevenness, texture change, and collagen breakdown. It is the single highest-leverage skin habit.
Why
Sun exposure is the single largest controllable input to skin texture, pigment evenness, and fine lines — and daily protection is the highest-evidence, lowest-cost item in the entire catalog.
How
Apply broad-spectrum sunscreen to face and neck every morning as the last skincare step, as directed on the product label — even indoors and on cloudy days.
Cost · effort
$ (under ~$25/mo) · Low effort · Protection is immediate; visible tone and texture benefit accrues over months to years of consistent use.
Citations
Hughes et al. 2013, Ann Intern Med · Green et al. 2011, J Clin Oncol

Rule rule_no_daily_sunscreen

Skincare routine sequencing (thin-to-thick, actives separated, sun protection in the morning)
Grade C · Grade C — limited / emerging evidence
What
Applying products thin-to-thick, separating actives that irritate when layered together, and anchoring sun protection to the morning step improves tolerability — and adherence is what actually produces results.
Why
Your current routine has the right pieces but sequencing them correctly is what makes each one work.
How
Order matters more than product count: cleanse, treat, moisturize, and finish mornings with sunscreen. Introduce one new active at a time.
Cost · effort
Free · Low effort · Immediate improvement in tolerability and consistency.
Citations
Draelos 2010, Cosmetic Dermatology: Products and Procedures (verify)

Rule rule_no_daily_sunscreen

09 Methodology & disclaimers

How your numbers were produced.

Your analysis at a glance

> Demo report — generated from synthetic reference data, not your photos.

We measured 44 of 44 facial metrics across proportions, eyes, nose, jaw, lips, symmetry, and skin, and compared each against demographic reference norms for your profile.

44 measurements sit squarely in the harmonious range for your demographic — these are working for you, and your plan is designed to protect them.

0 measurements show meaningful room for improvement through non-surgical means. Your protocol below addresses them in priority order.

This report describes measurements and evidence-based options. It never scores you as a person, and it is not medical advice.

Your face, mapped

Each measurement below comes from a 468-point facial landmark mesh fitted to your photo set. Distances are normalized to your interpupillary distance, so measurements are comparable across sessions and unaffected by camera distance. Every metric is compared to published anthropometric reference ranges for your sex and self-identified ancestry, and reported with the confidence of that reference data.

Facial proportions

  • Facial thirds balance — 0 cv. Your forehead, midface, and lower face divide the face into three well-balanced vertical sections, which reads as harmonious in both photos and person. _(moderately established reference data)_
  • Facial fifths (eye width vs face width) — 0.2 ratio. Your eye width sits close to one-fifth of your face width — the classical horizontal proportion — which is why the eye region reads as well-placed within the face. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Midface ratio — 1.26 ipd. The distance from your eye line to your mouth sits in the typical range relative to your eye spacing, giving the midface a balanced vertical presence. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR) — 1.99 ratio. Your facial width-to-height ratio sits in the typical range: the face is neither notably wide nor notably long through the midface. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Lower-third balance (philtrum area : chin area) — 0.49 ratio. Your lower face divides close to the classical one-third above the lip line, two-thirds below — a balanced lower-third that supports both smile and jawline. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Face height-to-width ratio — 1.5 ratio. Your overall face height-to-width proportion sits in the typical oval range, which pairs well with most hairstyle and eyewear geometries. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Jaw width vs cheekbone width — 0.75 ratio. Your jaw width sits in a balanced relationship to your cheekbone width, producing a smooth taper from midface to jawline. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Forehead height ratio — 0.33 ratio. Your forehead occupies close to the classical one-third of face height, keeping the vertical thirds in comfortable balance. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Eyes & periorbital area

  • Canthal tilt — 3.58 deg. Your outer eye corners sit modestly higher than the inner corners — the gentle upward tilt most faces carry — which gives the eye area an alert, rested look. _(moderately established reference data)_
  • Eye aspect ratio (openness) — 0.32 ratio. Your eye height-to-width proportion sits in the typical range, balancing openness with an almond contour. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Eye spacing vs face width — 0.43 ratio. Your eye spacing relative to face width sits in the typical range, which keeps the upper face evenly weighted and makes most eyewear geometries work without adjustment. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Upper eyelid exposure — 0.01 ipd. The visible band of upper eyelid above your lash line sits in the typical range, giving the eye area a rested, defined look. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Under-eye darkness index — 0.3 index. Your under-eye tone shows the mild, normal contrast most faces have against the cheek — nothing that reads as tired at conversational distance. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Under-eye hollow (shading gradient) — 0.25 index. Your lower-lid-to-cheek transition shows the mild shading gradient typical of adult faces; it does not read as hollow at normal viewing distance. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Brow position — 0.3 ipd. Your brows sit at a typical height above the eye line, framing the eyes without crowding or distancing them. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Brow tilt — 0 deg. Your brow axis runs close to level with a natural rise — the orientation most faces carry — which frames the eyes calmly. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Nose

  • Nasofrontal angle — 128.22 deg. The angle where your forehead meets your nasal bridge sits in the typical range, producing a smooth, well-defined upper profile line. _(moderately established reference data)_
  • Nasolabial angle — 147.53 deg. The angle where your nose base meets your upper lip sits in the typical range, giving the nose-to-lip transition a balanced, relaxed profile line. _(moderately established reference data)_
  • Nasal width vs eye spacing — 0.78 ratio. Your nasal base width sits in proportion with your eye spacing, anchoring the midface the way the classical canon describes. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Dorsal profile deviation — -0.08 ratio. Your nasal bridge tracks close to a straight line from the top of the nose to the tip in profile — an even dorsal line. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Nasal tip rotation — 50.19 deg. Your nasal tip rotation sits in the typical range, giving the profile a balanced tip position that photographs well from level angles. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Jaw, chin & lower face

  • Gonial angle — 140.62 deg. The corner of your jaw sits in the typical angular range, giving the profile a clear but soft-edged transition from ear to chin. _(moderately established reference data)_
  • Ramus-to-mandible proportion — 1.03 ratio. The vertical and horizontal portions of your jaw sit in typical proportion, giving the profile a balanced ear-to-chin frame. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Chin projection — 0.03 ratio. Your chin sits close to the facial reference line in profile — a balanced projection that supports both the jawline and the lip line. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Submental-cervical angle — 56.21 deg. The line from your chin back under the jaw sits in the typical range, keeping a clear separation between jawline and neck in profile. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Jaw definition index — 0.55 index. Your jawline shows typical edge definition in the capture lighting: clearly visible without being severe. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Chin height — 0.62 ipd. Your chin height sits in the typical range for the lower face, supporting a balanced transition from lip to jaw point. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Lip-chin-throat line — -0.13 ratio. Your lower lip sits just behind the nose-to-chin aesthetic line — the classic harmonious relationship between lips, chin, and throat in profile. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Lips & mouth

  • Upper-to-lower lip ratio — 0.67 ratio. Your upper and lower lip volumes sit near the classical relationship — a fuller lower lip balanced by a defined upper lip. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Lip fullness — 0.29 ipd. Your overall lip volume sits in the typical range for your facial scale, keeping the mouth in easy balance with the surrounding features. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Philtrum length — 0.26 ipd. The distance between your nose and upper lip sits in the typical range, keeping the nose-lip-chin column evenly spaced. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Smile arc — 0.04 ipd. Your smile arc is consonant: the corners lift comfortably above the central lip line when you smile, which is the configuration that reads warmest in photos. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Symmetry

  • Global facial symmetry — 0 ipd. Your face shows the small left-right differences virtually all faces have; none of them is large enough to register at conversational distance. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Eye level asymmetry — 0 ipd. Your eyes sit within the normal band of levelness; the tiny vertical difference most faces carry is present but visually silent. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Nasal deviation — 0 ipd. Your nasal tip sits within the normal distance of the facial midline; the nose reads as straight at ordinary viewing distances. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Skin

  • Skin texture roughness — 0.3 index. Your skin texture variance sits in the typical range: normal pores and surface character without patterns that read as rough on camera. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Skin redness index — 0.3 index. Your measured cheek redness sits in the typical range — the normal warmth most complexions show under neutral light. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Pigmentation evenness — 0.75 index. Your skin tone is typically even across the measured patches — small local variations, but nothing that reads as patchiness at conversational distance. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Periorbital luminance delta — -0.08 index. The brightness around your eyes sits in the normal relationship to your cheeks — the mild periorbital shading nearly all adult faces show. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Apparent vs stated age gap — 0 years. The model’s estimate of your photographed age tracks your stated age closely — your skin and features are reading true to your years. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Fine-line density — 0.2 index. Your measured fine-line density is typical for an adult face — early expression lines in the usual places, reading as animation rather than age. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Feature character

  • Facial dimorphism composite — 0 z. Your measured features balance angular and soft elements in roughly equal measure — a versatile middle position on the masculine–feminine continuum that adapts well to different styling directions. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Cheekbone prominence — 0.88 ratio. Your cheekbone width sits in typical proportion to your facial outline, giving the midface visible but understated structure. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_
  • Hairline shape class — 1 class. Your hairline follows a rounded arc across the forehead — the most common frame shape, and one that pairs easily with nearly any hairstyle. _(limited reference data — interpret as a tendency)_

Your protocol

Phase 1 — Foundation (days 0–30) - Daily broad-spectrum sunscreen (applied as directed on the product label) _(priority: high, evidence grade A)_ - Why: Broad-spectrum filters absorb or reflect ultraviolet radiation before it triggers the photodamage cascade that drives pigment unevenness, texture change, and collagen breakdown. It is the single highest-leverage skin habit. - Expected timeline: Protection is immediate; visible tone and texture benefit accrues over months to years of consistent use.. Cost: low. Effort: low. - Evidence: Hughes et al. 2013, Ann Intern Med; Green et al. 2011, J Clin Oncol - Skincare routine sequencing (thin-to-thick, actives separated, sun protection in the morning) _(priority: low, evidence grade C)_ - Why: Applying products thin-to-thick, separating actives that irritate when layered together, and anchoring sun protection to the morning step improves tolerability — and adherence is what actually produces results. - Expected timeline: Immediate improvement in tolerability and consistency.. Cost: free. Effort: low. - Evidence: Draelos 2010, Cosmetic Dermatology: Products and Procedures (verify)

Phase 2 — Building (days 30–90) _No items in this phase._

Phase 3 — Consolidation (days 90–365) _No items in this phase._

Your five focus metrics

Focus metrics will be assigned once a fully-measurable capture session is on file.

Methodology & limitations

  • Landmarking: MediaPipe Face Mesh (468 points) fitted per photo; measurements normalized to interpupillary distance.
  • Reference norms: published cephalometric and anthropometric literature, keyed by sex and ancestry group. Confidence is reported per metric; low-confidence norms automatically soften interpretation language and are never presented as firm deviations.
  • Protocol selection: a deterministic rules engine selects every intervention from an expert-curated catalog; language generation cannot add, remove, or re-rank interventions. Every item carries a traceable source rule.
  • Safety gate: every report passes an automated pre-delivery scan (contraindication screening, no dosing language, no medical claims, no person-scoring, evidence traceability) before you see it.
  • Limitations: single-session 2D photo analysis carries pose and lighting sensitivity; measurements marked lower-confidence should be read as tendencies. This analysis is educational and is not a medical evaluation.
  • Kanon provides educational appearance analysis. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
  • All clinical-grade options are flagged for discussion with a licensed provider; Kanon never prescribes.
  • Measurements are estimates from 2D photographs and carry the confidence levels stated per metric.
  • This service is for adults 18 and over.
  • Kanon provides educational appearance analysis. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Report rep_qchm89fnmrbh13b5 · engine v1 · every report passes an automated safety gate before delivery.